 |
Dignity Canada
Dignité
|
|
...most of us already know what the RC
Church teaches about us, our relationships, and our "condition". The
following article is a succinct but thorough and current summary of church
doctrine, worthy of your hard drive space. Not necessarily a pleasant read, but
isn't it our duty as Catholics to hear what the Church has to say, and then our
duty as persons of conscience to correct her.
What the church has to say
By John
Monczunski
Despite repeated iterations and reiterations of Roman Catholic Church
teaching over the past 30 years from the Vatican and the U.S. Catholic bishops,
the morality of homosexuality remains clouded and confused in the minds of many
Catholics. Stated in the simplest terms, the core of that teaching emphasizes
that being homosexual is not a sin, but engaging in
homosexual acts is a sin. The distinction between the individual and the
act has consistently been maintained in church teaching: Love the sinner; hate
the sin.
In promulgating the teaching, the church has attempted to walk a fine line
between compassion for the individual and a defense of firm moral values and the
integrity of the traditional family.
The Catechism of the Catholic
Church states the church's condemnation of homosexual acts
unequivocally. "Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual
acts as great depravity, tradition has always declared homosexual acts are
intrinsically disordered. They are contrary to natural law. They close the
sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and
sexual complementarity. Under no circumstance can they be approved."
Although the church steadfastly condemns homosexual acts, on the pastoral
level it has just as consistently argued for compassion for homosexual people.
In the 1973 document Principles to Guide Confessors in Questions of
Homosexuality, the U.S. Catholic bishops encouraged confessors to "avoid
both harshness and permissiveness," to not make psychiatric treatment a
requirement when a change in orientation is impossible, to encourage stable
friendships, and to understand that homosexuality is not a choice.
Recognizing that judging the morality of individual acts is always a
complicated issue, the 1975 Vatican document
A Declaration on Certain
Questions Concerning Sexual Ethics emphasized that prudence should be
used in judging the culpability for individual homosexual acts. "In fact,
circumstances may exist, or may have existed in the past, which would reduce or
remove the culpability of the individual in a given instance; or other
circumstances may increase it. What is at all costs to be avoided is the
unfounded and demeaning assumption that the sexual behaviour of homosexual
persons is always and totally compulsive and therefore inculpable."
The
Catechism
points out, "The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual
tendencies is not negligible. This inclination, which is objectively disordered,
constitutes for most of them a trial. They must be accepted with respect,
compassion and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard
should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God's will in their lives
and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord's cross the
difficulties they may encounter from their condition."
The church notes that homosexual persons are not singled out to a higher
standard of morality. The bishops have consistently maintained that the
expression of sex is licit only within the confines of a marriage that is open
to the possibility of creating new life. Therefore, church teaching requires the
same conduct from homosexual and heterosexual single people: chastity. The U.S.
bishops also write: "because heterosexuals can usually look forward to marriage
and homosexuals, while their orientation continues, might not, the Christian
community should provide them a special degree of pastoral understanding and
care."
Generally, the U.S. bishops have focused on pastoral concerns. Along with
such concerns, the Vatican also has clarified the philosophical underpinnings of
church teaching. Troubled that the church had given mixed signals on the matter
of homosexuality in its 1975 Vatican document, for instance, in 1986 the Vatican
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) emphasized its opposition to
living out the homosexual orientation. The
CDF wrote: "In the discussion
which followed the publication of the [1975] Declaration, an overly benign
interpretation was given to the homosexual condition itself, some going so far
as to call it neutral, or even good. Although the particular inclination of the
homosexual person is not a sin, it is more or less a strong tendency ordered
toward an intrinsic moral evil; and thus the inclination itself must be seen as
an objective disorder. Therefore, special concern and pastoral attention should
be directed toward those who have this condition, lest they be led to believe
that the living out of this orientation in homosexual activity is a morally
acceptable option. It is not."
The CDF went on to voice its concern that certain organizations ministering
to gay and lesbian Catholics were blurring church teaching. The doctrinal group
wrote: "All support should be withdrawn from any organizations which seek to
undermine the teachings of the Church, which are ambiguous about it or neglect
it entirely."
Most recently the Vatican has addressed the issue of homosexual marriage,
which it considers an assault on the traditional family. Last year, the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith issued Considerations Regarding
Proposals to Give Legal Recognition to Unions Between Homosexual
Persons. The document voices the concern that if homosexual
relationships are approved by civil law then such a union "becomes an
institution of the legal structure and therefore assumes profound influence
resulting in changing the organization of society 'contrary to the common
good.'"
Further, the CDF writes: "Lifestyles and the underlying presuppositions these
express not only externally shape the life of society, but also tend to modify
the younger generation's perception and evaluation of forms of behaviour. Legal
recognition of homosexual unions would obscure certain basic moral values and
cause a devaluation of the institution of marriage."
The document also states: "Allowing children to be adopted by persons living
in such unions would actually mean doing violence to these children, in the
sense that their condition of dependency would be used to place them in an
environment that is not conducive to their full human development. (They would
be deprived of the experience of either fatherhood or motherhood.) This is
gravely immoral and in open contradiction to the principle recognized also in
the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, that the best
interests of the child as the weaker and more vulnerable party are to be the
paramount consideration in every case.
"The inevitable consequence of legal recognition of homosexual unions would
be the redefinition of marriage which would become, in its legal status, an
institution devoid of essential reference factors linked to heterosexuality --
for example, procreation and raising children. . . . Marriage would undergo a
radical transformation with grave detriment to the common good."
Finally, the document concludes, "The principles of respect and
non-discrimination cannot be invoked to support legal recognition of homosexual
unions. (Refusing social recognition is only unacceptable when it is contrary to
justice.)"
In calling on Catholic politicians to oppose legalizing homosexual marriage,
the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith argues that legalization would
make homosexual marriage a model in society and "obscure values which belong to
the common inheritance of humanity. The Church cannot fail to defend these
values for the good of men and women and for the good of society itself."
Dealing with homosexuality is one of a few moral issues that cause many
people of good will and divergent understanding a great deal of pain. The church
steadfastly maintains that homosexual men and women are called to celibacy,
along with all non-married Christians, and all Christians must extend to them
compassion and understanding. "Though at times you may feel discouraged, hurt or
angry, do not walk away from your families, from the Christian community, from
all those who love you," the U.S. bishops plead to homosexual persons in their
1997 pastoral letter. "In you God is revealed. You are always our children."
Dignity Canada Dignité is
Canada's organization of Roman Catholics who are concerned about our
church's sexual theology, particularly as it pertains to gay, lesbian,
bisexual, and transgendered persons. We work in collaboration with other
Catholic organizations seeking reform in our church's leadership and
teachings.